Louisville N. R. Co. v. Maddox
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The suit was for damages and the judgment was for the plaiiitiff. There are many assignments of error, and the argument of counsel will, for convenience, be followed in such respects as may be practicable.
The trial was had on counts as amended to which demurrer had been overruled. The defendants pleaded the general issue, and in short by consent with leave to give in evidence any. matter which being well pleaded would be admsisible in defense of the action.
It may be well to state several propositions of law which have been declared by this court, as illustrated in the general…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Armstrong v. Montgomery Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Tobler v. Pioneer Mining & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Western Railway of Alabama v. MutchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- B'ham Ry. L. & P. Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Morgan Hill Paving Co. v. FonvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Phillips v. Smalley Maintenance Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- General Motors Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. WeldonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Tolbert v. GulsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Brenda Phillips v. Smalley Maintenance Services, Inc., a Corporation, and Ray Smalley, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.