Legal Opinion

F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Erickson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 27, 1930No. 6 Div. 362PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Appellee sued appellant and one Sprague in a tort action for damages sustained by the plaintiff when her foot slipped and she fell to the floor in the store of appellant in the city of Birmingham. There was a vferdict and judgment against the Woolworth Company only, from which it prosecutes this appeal.

As to ’the pleading, plaintiff rested her case upon count A, to which demurrer was interposed and overruled.

Defendant insists this count does not sufficiently disclose the relationship existing between defendant and plaintiff out of which a duty to her arose. The argument has been duly…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Southern Ry. Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Spickernagle v. WoolworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Mobile Dry Docks Co. v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Lamson & Sessions Bolt Co. v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Birmingham Baptist Hospital, Inc. v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Thornton v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Louisville N. R. Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Otwell v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API