Legal Opinion

Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. Callahan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 13, 1943No. 3 Div. 387PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an action for personal injuries against two defendants jointly. Count 1 charges a joint liability against them in general terms. Counts 2 and 3 allege that the liability of the corporate defendant (bus company) is because of the negligence of the individual defendant (Coleman) as agent of the other. There was a general verdict for plaintiff against the bus company only. Coleman had a judgment of acquittal and discharge. Therefore the verdict against the bus company defendant can only be sustained on the first count. Brooks v. City of Birmingham, 239 Ala. 172, 194 So.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ala. Great Southern R. R. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  3. Louisville N. R. Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Birmingham Railway & Electric Co. v. BairdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  5. Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co. v. MalletteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. WeldonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Otwell v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Taylor v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. JeantyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Village Toyota Co., Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API