Legal Opinion

State v. Bruce.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 2017No. SCWC-15-0000439PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RECKTENWALD, C.J., NAKAYAMA, McKENNA, POLLACK, AND WILSON, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT BY NAKAYAMA, J.

*301 I. INTRODUCTION

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawai'i (the State) charged Respondent/Defendant-Appellant Lawrence L. Bruce (Bruce) and Respondent/Defendant-Appellant Justin McKinley (McKinley) with offenses arising from their alleged involvement in and benefit from the activities of a prostitute, the complaining witness (CW). After being tried as co-defendants in the same jury trial, the jury found Bruce guilty of promoting prostitution in the second degree, and found McKinley guilty of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. RoganHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. United States v. Carlos GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. State v. SawyerHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. CeballosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Jaythan HangSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2025
  2. State v. MagbulosHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API