Barrows v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
A jury convicted appellant David Barrows of engaging in disorderly and disruptive conduct on United States Capitol grounds, in violation of D.C.Code § 10-503.16(b)(4) (2001). 1 The government’s evidence was that, on September 11, 2007, appellant entered a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing in the Hart Senate Office Building and, during the testimony of General David Petraeus, shouted, “You are trying to set a trap for us to bomb the helpless people of Iran. Aren’t 750,000 deaths enough for your blood thirst?”
Appellant raises four issues on appeal, all of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ronnie Payne v. Patricia StansberryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Fortune v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Jonathan Blades v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.