Legal Opinion

Barrows v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 2011No. 08-CM-740PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Associate Judge:

A jury convicted appellant David Barrows of engaging in disorderly and disruptive conduct on United States Capitol grounds, in violation of D.C.Code § 10-503.16(b)(4) (2001). 1 The government’s evidence was that, on September 11, 2007, appellant entered a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing in the Hart Senate Office Building and, during the testimony of General David Petraeus, shouted, “You are trying to set a trap for us to bomb the helpless people of Iran. Aren’t 750,000 deaths enough for your blood thirst?”

Appellant raises four issues on appeal, all of…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ronnie Payne v. Patricia StansberryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  2. Fortune v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. In re TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Jonathan Blades v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API