Legal Opinion

In re Nomination Paper of Nader

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 2004PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONSOLIDATED FINDINGS, OPINION AND ORDER

COLINS, President Judge.

On September 20, 2004, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania remanded this matter to this Court with directions to review every signature contained in the nomination papers of Ralph Nader and Peter Camejo (Candidates) to determine whether the Candidates had gathered a sufficient number of valid signatures to be listed on the Commonwealth’s general election ballot. With the general election scheduled for November 2, 2004, and the 67 counties of this state waiting patiently to print their ballots, .this Court, immediately upon receipt…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Taxpayers United for Assessment Cuts v. Richard H. Austin, Citizens for Education Ballot Question Committee, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  2. In Re Nomination of FlahertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Wieskerger AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. In Re DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. In Re Nomination Papers of NaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JermynSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. State v. LoyalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  3. In Re Nomination Paper of NaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Capital Academy Charter School v. Harrisburg School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. In Re NaderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API