Legal Opinion

In Re Nomination Papers of Nader

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 2004No. 154 MAP 2004PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 20th day of September, 2004, the Order of the Commonwealth Court dated August 30, 2004 is REVERSED and VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED on an expedited basis for hearings on the Petition to Set Aside the Nomination Papers of Ralph Nader and Peter Miguel Camejo.

The Petition for Review of the Denial of a Request for a Stay and Supersedeas is dismissed as moot.

Opinion to follow.

OPINION

Justice NEWMAN.

In this case, we must determine whether Ralph Nader (Nader) and Peter Miguel Camejo (Camejo) (collectively, the Candidates) will appear on the November 2, 2004 Pennsylvania…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by37 opinions

  1. In Re the Nomination Petitions & Papers of StevensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Blankenship v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Nomination Petition of FarneseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Street Road Bar & Grille, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. In Re Nomination Paper of NaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API