Legal Opinion
In Re Driscoll
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 6, 2004No. 30 MAP 2004PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Justice NIGRO.
Appellant Anthony Rybak appeals from the Order of the Commonwealth Court which denied his request to set aside the nomination petition of Joseph Driscoll (“Candidate”), a candidate for the Democratic Party nomination for the office of Representative in the United States Congress for the 15th Congressional District. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the Commonwealth Court’s order.
On or before February 17, 2004, Candidate filed a nomination petition with the Secretary of the Commonwealth containing approximately 2,500 signatures from registered…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ross Nomination PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- In Re Nomination of FlahertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- In Re Nomination of CianfraniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- In Re Nomination Petition of CarrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- In Re Nomination Papers of NaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- In re Nomination Petition of BeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- In Re Nomination Petition of FarneseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Bennett v. Harford CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.