Legal Opinion

Hollopeter v. OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1970PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The only issue in this appeal is the liability of the defendant insurance company for attorney fees.

Several people were injured when they were struck by plaintiff’s car while it was being used by his son. The injured persons made claims against plaintiff and his son. Plaintiff carried a liability insurance policy with the defendant insurance company. The insurance company brought a declaratory judgment proceeding against the present plaintiff to determine whether it had coverage. We affirmed a decision by the trial court that the defendant did have coverage. Oregon Mutual Ins. v. Hollopeter,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. MaladyOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Draper v. MULLENNEXOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. HollopeterOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pickinpaugh v. MortonOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Samuel v. FrohnmayerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Oregon, State Highway Com'n v. DeLong Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. Beaver v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API