Legal Opinion

OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. v. Hollopeter

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1968PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

A liability policy issued by the plaintiff insurance company lists the defendant Theodore W. Hollopeter as a named insured. On February 10, 1967, Theodore permitted his son, defendant Teddy Hollopeter, to drive Theodore’s Oldsmobile. Contrary to his father’s instructions, Teddy permitted a friend, defendant Cheryle Claybaugh, to drive the Oldsmobile, with Teddy as a passenger. While driving, Cheryle collided with another vehicle, inflicting injuries upon the occupants of the other vehicle. The injured persons made claims against the Hollopeters and they called upon the plaintiff to protect…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bauman v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Hardware Mutual Casualty v. SameCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  3. Kessler v. KerrOregon Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. McGraw v. GwinnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Nationwide Insurance v. ToblerOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Oberstein v. Adair County Board of ReviewCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1982
  5. American Economy Insurance v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API