Legal Opinion

York v. Ambrose

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

York and Ambrose were • partners doing a Sporting Goods business under the name of York-Ambrose Arms Company, 162 S. Main Street, Memphis. August 8, 1925, Ambrose sold to York his half interest in the business, the terms of sale being set forth in a written contract. The transfer carried York’s interest in the business, the good will, and the trade name. The contract contained a provision as follows:

“I, J. T. Ambrose, covenant with Chas. V. York, that I will not directly, indirectly, solely or jointly as principal, agent, manager or otherwise, be concerned or interested in the same character…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jaques & Tinsley Co. v. Carstarphen Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Daly v. Sumpter Drug Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Neas v. BorchesTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Fecheimer-Keifer Co. v. BurtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Mahoney-Jones Co. v. Sams Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Teague Bros., Inc. v. Martin & Bayley, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  2. Third Nat. Bank of Nashville v. KeathleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  3. Arnold v. MayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
  4. Fowler Bros. Cox v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Bradas & Gheens, Inc. v. BrewerTennessee Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API