Fowler Bros. Cox v. Davis
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss
Rogers & Company, incorporated, owned and operated a large number of retail merchandise stores, also a central distributing warehouse or storehouse in Knoxville, from which it supplied its retail stores. It proposed a sale to complainant of its stock of goods in this central warehouse on terms satisfactory to complainant, which included the payment out of the consideration of an indebtedness to complainant. Counsel for complainant conceived that the Bulk iSales Law (Chap. 133, Acts of 1901) applied and should be complied with. Counsel for Rogers & Company held to a different opinion, with the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- York v. AmbroseTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by1 opinion
- Arnold v. MayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929