Arnold v. May
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the CourtSenter, J.
These causes, While not consolidated in the lower court, were tried at the same time by the Chancellor, on the respective records, and the evidence in each case considered by the Chancellor in both cases. Arnold was the real defendant in the cause of James May v. S. O. Henley et al., and was the complainant in the first cause. Two separate transcripts were sent up on the appeals in this court, but with the agreement that the two causes would be consolidated at the hearing in this court, and reference made to the respective records, since a determination of the causes either favorably -or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cantrell v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- York v. AmbroseTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Fowler Bros. Cox v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by1 opinion
- INDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. JustusCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008