Legal Opinion

Bryan v. Scholl

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1887No. 12,763PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This was a suit in ejectment, the complaint being in the usual form for the recovery of real property.

The defendant filed an answer which is denominated a plea in abatement. It alleged, in substance, that the plaintiff based his right to recover the land in dispute upon a decree ■of foreclosure, given against the defendant by the Clinton Circuit Court, in favor of one Heavilon. It was averred, that within a year from the rendition of the decree through which the plaintiff claimed, the defendant below filed his complaint in the proper court, asking for a review of the judgment and ■decree, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stockwell v. State ex rel. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Board of Commissioners of Tippecanoe Co. v. Lafayette, Muncie, & Bloomington RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Brown v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Dutch v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Walker v. HellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Miller v. HodgesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  2. Tewksbury v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Needham v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Easterling v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. State ex rel. Arthurs v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API