Legal Opinion

State v. Comer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1902No. 19,663PublishedCited by 39 opinions

E'rom Clinton Circuit Court.; J. V. Kent, Judge. James Comer was indicted for selling liis vote, and from a judgment discharging defendant, the State appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

Appellee was charged by indictment with selling his vote, in violation of §1, Acts 1899, p. 381, being §2329 Burns 1901. Appellee filed a plea in abatement to *612the indictment, to which plea appellant demurred for want of facts. The court overruled the demurrer, and appellant filed a reply in two paragraphs. A demurrer for want of facts to each paragraph of reply was sustained, and final judgment rendered discharging appellee. The errors assigned call in question the action of the court in overruling appellant’s demurrer to the plea in abatement, and in sustaining appellee’s demurrer to each…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barron Ex Rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Brown v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. State v. FassetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
  5. Needham v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Ajabu v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. DeVaney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Banks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Mack v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Scribner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API