Myer Feinstein Co. v. De Vincent
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
In this action upon a contractor’s performance bond, an appeal has been taken by Alfonso De Vincent, defendant-obligor, from the action of the court below in refusing his motions for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial and entering judgment in the sum of $735 upon a finding in favor of Edward Gr. Holloway, Inc., the use plaintiff, for whom the work in question was to have been performed.
The material facts may be thus summarized: On October 11, 1940, the defendant, a bricklaying contractor, entered into a written contract with the use plaintiff in which he agreed to perform…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mayor, Etc., of N.Y. v. . SEC. Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. Johnston & Harder, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Wilson v. WernwagSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. ChristianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Weinglass v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Mancini v. MorrowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Magar v. Lifetime, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Golomb v. KorusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Briskman v. Greenhill Farms of Lower Merion, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.