Legal Opinion

Myer Feinstein Co. v. De Vincent

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1942No. Appeal, 196PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

In this action upon a contractor’s performance bond, an appeal has been taken by Alfonso De Vincent, defendant-obligor, from the action of the court below in refusing his motions for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial and entering judgment in the sum of $735 upon a finding in favor of Edward Gr. Holloway, Inc., the use plaintiff, for whom the work in question was to have been performed.

The material facts may be thus summarized: On October 11, 1940, the defendant, a bricklaying contractor, entered into a written contract with the use plaintiff in which he agreed to perform…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mayor, Etc., of N.Y. v. . SEC. Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. Johnston & Harder, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Wilson v. WernwagSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. ChristianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Weinglass v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Mancini v. MorrowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Magar v. Lifetime, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Golomb v. KorusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Briskman v. Greenhill Farms of Lower Merion, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API