Legal Opinion

Whatcott v. Whatcott

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 4, 1990No. 890279-CAPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals the trial cohrt’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant. He argues that his alleged mental incompetence invokes the delayed discovery rule and tolls the statutes of limitations. We affirm.

FACTS

Plaintiff alleges that his father, Melvin J. Whatcott, sexually abused him during childhood. He seeks damages for psychological injury from the repeated molestations. The last alleged act of abuse occurred when plaintiff was eighteen yet the complaint was not filed until plaintiff was twenty-three-years-old. 1

Plaintiff acknowledges that the respective…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Atlas Corp. v. Clovis National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Sampson v. RichinsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. CECO Corp. v. Concrete Specialists, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Chapman Ex Rel. Chapman v. Primary Children's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Travis v. ZiterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. O'NEAL v. Division of Family ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Breuer-Harrison, Inc. v. CombeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. Olsen v. HooleyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Shire Development v. Frontier InvestmentsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API