Legal Opinion
Olsen v. Hooley
Utah Supreme Court
Decided October 27, 1993No. 910125PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Justice:
The trial court dismissed plaintiffs complaint on the ground that it was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Plaintiff appeals, arguing that because she had repressed all memory of the operative facts until after the limitations period had run, the statute of limitations was tolled. We reverse and remand.
Because this is an appeal from the grant of a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, we accept as true the allegations made in the complaint. Lisa Hooley Olsen began living with her adoptive parents, Harold and Ila Hooley,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- McCarthy v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. LongUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Jerrie M. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Retherford v. AT & T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Fratus v. DeLandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Doe v. RoeArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Farris v. ComptonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Fratus v. DelandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.