Legal Opinion

Shire Development v. Frontier Investments

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 3, 1990No. 890738-CAPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before GARFF, JACKSON and NEWEY, 1 JJ. GARFF, Judge:

Appellants, Shire Development and Albert Charboneau appeal an order granting Frontier Investments’ (Frontier) motion for summary judgment. The trial court concluded that appellants have no standing to bring an action against Frontier on a real estate contract when appellants were neither parties nor assignees to the contract. We affirm.

In 1984, Frontier sold a piece of Nevada property to Steven T. Glezos (Glezos) under a real estate sales contract. Shortly thereafter, appellants entered into an oral joint venture agreement with Glezos…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wing v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Mascaro v. DavisUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Professional Lens Plan, Inc. v. Polaris Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. County of Clark v. Bonanza No. 1Nevada Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Arrow Industries, Inc. v. Zions First National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Property Advocates, LLC v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. State v. ArchambeauCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  3. Pixton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  4. Anderson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  5. United States v. Triangle OilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API