Legal Opinion
Polk v. Cleveland Ry. Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 4, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The Cleveland Railway Company has been for the past 15 years or more the operator of all of the city street car lines in the city of Cleveland. In 1906 the company entered into the contract that is pleaded by the plaintiffs, a copy of which is attached to the petition, with the Local Union No. 268 of the Amalgamated Association of Street and Electric Railway Employees of America, hereinafter referred to as the union, which union was affiliated with the American Federation of Labor. For these past 15 years, the company and the union have been operating under and in conformance…
2Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Westinghouse Securities Litigation. Margaret Alessi, Gloria Bertinato, Michael C. Christner, Anna Marie Eroshevich, Toby Feuer, Kanwal K. Gupta, M.D., Matthew Harlib, Stanley Hershfang, Arnold M. Jacob, Louise Jacob, David Jaroslawicz, David Kirschner, Nathan Kleinhandler, Gerry Krim, Peter Lagorio, Nelson Lovins, Donald McLennan Jacob Joseph Miller, Dr. Alexander Miller, Thomas Mitchell, Edward Murabito, Michael E. Nogay, Joseph Raschak, Richard Schwartzchild, Dr. Michael Slavin, Dr. Michael Solomon, Selma Solomon, Spring Creek Cardiomedical Center, Ruth Stepak, Jim Thompson, Patricia J. Vanartsdalen, Albert ZuckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Local No. 234 of United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry of United States & Canada v. Henley & Beckwith, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953
- LOCAL NO. 234, ETC. v. Henley & Beckwith, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Smith v. GladneyTexas Supreme Court · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.