Legal Opinion

Toomey v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 14, 1926No. 17444PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

POSTER, 0.

This was an action instituted in the. court below by the plaintiff in error, Paul Toomey, as plaintiff, against Richard Lloyd Jones and the Tulsa Tribune Company, defendants in error, as defendants, for a libel based upon a newspaper publication. Parties will be hereinafter referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

It appears from the record that in 1921 a demurrer to the amended' petition of the plaintiff was overruled, from which judgment overruling their demurrer the defendants attempted to appeal to the Supreme Court, but the appeal was, by this court, .dismissed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. . CaldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Kee v. Armstrong, Byrd & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Phoenix Printing Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Culmer v. CanbyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  5. Jones v. ToomeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mencher v. ChesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Spanel v. PeglerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
  3. M. F. Patterson Dental Supply Company, Inc. And E. O. Blake v. Cullom S. WadleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  4. Utah State Farm Bureau Federation v. National Farmers Union Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  5. Gallagher v. ChavalasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API