Legal Opinion

Phoenix Printing Co. v. Robertson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 1921No. 9953PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; Chas. G-. Watts, Judge. Action by Charley Robertson against the Phoenix Printing Company for libel. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

McNEILL, j.

This controversy arose over the publication of an article in the Muskogee Daily Phoenix, a daily paper published by the Phoenix Printing Company in the city of Muskogee, on May 24, 1914. The publication complained of is as follows:

‘‘Man’s Tango Talk Proved Provoking— This Way Out, Sir. Charley Robertson, a Chauffeur, Didn’t Make a Hit With His Opinion.

“Just what Charley Robertson, a chauffeur thinks about the tango will probably never be known. Charley started to tell last night as he was tripping the light fantastic at Leighton's Hall, South Fourth street.
“He had no more than…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kee v. Armstrong, Byrd & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Dimmitt v. McDowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Flake Ex Rel. Flake v. Greensboro News Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Fite v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. M. F. Patterson Dental Supply Company, Inc. And E. O. Blake v. Cullom S. WadleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  4. Hargrove v. Oklahoma Press Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Tulsa Tribune Co. v. KightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API