Legal Opinion
Kee v. Armstrong, Byrd & Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 17, 1919No. 4729PublishedCited by 42 opinions
Error from District Oourt,. Oklahoma County; Edward Dewes Oldfield, Judge. Action by Armstrong,(Byrd & Co., a corporation, against O. B. Kee and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
This controversy arose over the publication of an article appearing in the Daily Oklahoman November 22, 1908. The publication complained of is as follows:
“I have a $100.00 bond from Armstrong-Byrd Music Co., that I will give to any one than can use it. I bought a piano there and when I showed my bond they refused to accept it without I would add $50.00 to the price I paid for it. Mrs. O. B. Kee.”
Upon the trial of the case in the district court, plaintiff, Armstrong, Byrd & Co., recovered a judgment against O. B. Kee and Bose Kee. The case was appealed here, and on July 13, 1915, an opinion…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Marlin Fire Arms Co. v. . ShieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Hopkins Chemical Co. v. Read Drug & Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Lahoma Oil Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Kelly v. RoetzelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Penry v. DozierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Ames v. American National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Brock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Erick Bowman Remedy Co. v. Jensen Salsbery Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Fawcett Publications, Inc. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.