Legal Opinion

Miners & Merchants Bank v. Herron

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1935No. Civil No. 3592PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

— Tills is a proceeding in mandamus. It appears from the plaintiff’s complaint that in 1919 Pinal connty issued and sold, under the provisions of chapter 2, title 52, Revised Statutes of Arizona 1913 (paragraphs 5266-5285), 1,000 “Connty of Pinal Road Bonds” for $1,000 each, bearing interest at 5% per cent, per annum as evidenced by attached coupons payable on May 1st and November 1st of each year; that beginning with May 1, 1930, and ending May 1, 1934, the connty failed to pay interest coupons as they fell due in the sum of $39,517.50; that the plaintiff is the owner and holder of 45 of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Carr v. State ex rel. CoetlosquetIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. City of Austin v. CahillTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. East St. Louis v. AmySupreme Court of the United States · 1887

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fleming v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Maricopa County v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Maricopa County v. OsbornArizona Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State Board of Directors for Junior Colleges v. NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Board of Supervisors v. Miners & Merchants BankArizona Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API