Legal Opinion

Purulewski v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1914No. Docket No. 103PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hally, J. Case by Rosie Purulewski against the Detroit United Railway and another for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant street railway brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an action on the case brought against the Detroit United Railway and Henry Mincel, the owner of a coal wagon, as defendants, to recover damages for an injury to the plaintiff, a married woman 55 years of age, which injury was caused by a collision between a car operated by the first-named defendant and a heavily loaded coal wagon of the other defendant, whereby a heavy plank was thrown from the top of the load of coal, striking the plaintiff, breaking her right leg, and otherwise severely and permanently injuring her, on the morn*135ing of March 9, 1912, at the southeast corner of Forest…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ablard v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Nissly v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Bush v. St. Joseph & Benton Harbor Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Ferguson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Levy v. Houghton County Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prince v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Granader v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hildebrandt v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API