Levy v. Houghton County Street Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Houghton; Streeter, J. Case by A. Louis Levy, administrator of the estate of Samuel Sausonsky, deceased, against the Houghton County Street Railway Company. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by tbe court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This suit was brought under the survival act by the administrator of the estate of Samuel Sausonsky, deceased, against the defendant to recover damages for running intestate down and killing him, as alleged and claimed, in a wanton and reckless manner, on December 24, 1907, about noon of that day.
The defendant company operates a street railway between the villages of Houghton and Calumet, and passes through various mining locations, among which are the locations known as “Mesnard” and “Arcadia,” on the property of the Quincy Mining Company. These two locations are about 2,000 feet apart, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trudell v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Lyons v. Bay Cities Consolidated Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Redson v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Perego v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Kotila v. Houghton County Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davidson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Holmes v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Bloch v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Dolstrom v. Newport Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Purulewski v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.