Legal Opinion

Granader v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1919No. Docket No. 41PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Case by Jacob Granader, an infant, by his next friend, against the Detroit United Railway and another for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant railway brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, C. J.

Plaintiff, a boy 17 years of age, was riding on the platform of a motor truck owned by Morgan & Wright, and operated by one of its drivers, in the city of Detroit. The motor truck was going south on Brush street. When it reached the north *368curb line of Warren avenue the driver observed a street car about 250 feet away approaching from the west. He kept on his course and concluded he could cross in advance of the car. When he was entering on the track the car was about 125 feet distant. The motor truck was 40 feet long and before he could clear the track the street car struck the rear end of it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richter v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Putnam v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Bush v. St. Joseph & Benton Harbor Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Gardner v. Detroit Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Millette v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Yeoman v. Muskegon Traction & Lighting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API