Legal Opinion

Federal Paving Corp. v. Prudisch

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mandamus to compel Fred Prudisch, city treasurer of the city of Wauwatosa, to pay a certain city order issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the common council of the city of Wauwatosa. Walter G. Winding and Walter A. Bechthold both petitioned to be made party defendants, alleging that they were taxpayers and that the disposition of the funds sought to be enforced would be an illegal dissipation of the moneys of the city. The court made Winding and Bechthold parties defendant, and the latter filed cross complaints. City Treasurer Fred Prudisch filed a return. Plaintiff demurred both to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Risch v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Johnson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Adams v. City of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Boyd v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Burnham v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Columbia County v. Board of Trustees of Wisconsin Retirement FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Puerto Rico Tobacco Corp. v. BuscagliaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1944
  3. Voters with Facts v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District v. SteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State Ex Rel. Federal Paving Corp. v. PrudischWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API