State Ex Rel. Federal Paving Corp. v. Prudisch
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
Controversies in relation to the claim upon which there is based herein the right asserted to compel payment by mandamus were involved in Bechthold v. Wauwatosa, 228 Wis. 544, 277 N. W. 657, 280 N. W. 320; Federal Paving Corp. v. Wauwatosa, 231 Wis. 655, 286 N. W. 546, and Federal Paving Corp. v. Prudisch, 235 Wis. 527, 293 N. W. 156. Subsequent to the decision in the latter case, in which sec. 62.215, Stats. 1939, was held invalid, the legislature enacted sec. 66.295, Stats. 1941 (ch. 272, Laws of 1941), subs. (1) and (2) whereof provide:
“(1) Whenever any city of whatever class, however…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Boyd v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Burnham v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Bekkedal v. City of ViroquaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- City of Milwaukee v. TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District v. SteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Leuch v. EgelhoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Leuch v. EgelhoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Hovde v. Village of WaunakeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987