Legal Opinion

Baruch Investment Co. v. Danning

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 21, 1975No. Nos. 74-1210, 74-1228PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge.

Petitioners Baruch Investment Company, dba Advance Industrial Finance Company (“AIF”), and Trans-West Factors (“TWF”) appeal from the judgment of the district court, affirming in all respects the order of the Referee in Bankruptcy. That order awarded the trustee, after a number of offsetting procedures, the net amount of $913.66 against AIF. AIF contests the finding that it and TWF had engaged in usurious transactions with the bankrupt, Vehm Engineering Corporation (“Vehm”), and that the trustee could recover on behalf of Vehm despite a release of all…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Westman v. DyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of Vehm Engineering Corporation, Bankrupt. Baruch Investment Company, Dba Advance Industrial Finance Company and Trans-West Factors, Petitioners-Cross-Respondents-Appellants v. Curtis B. Danning, Trustee, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner-Appellee. Baruch Investment Company, Dba Advance Industrial Finance Company and Trans-West Factors, Petitioners-Cross-Respondents-Appellees v. Curtis B. Danning, Trustee, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API