Legal Opinion
Lichtenstein v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 14, 1991No. Civ. A. 89-1143PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COHILL, Chief Judge.
Before us is plaintiffs Motion for Rescission of Order Based Upon Newly Discovered Evidence and plaintiffs Motion For Leave to Amend Complaint and to Name Charles W. Chewing, Jr. as an Additional Defendant. For the following reasons, we will grant plaintiffs motion for rescission and grant plaintiffs motion to amend in part.
BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 8, 1985, the plaintiff opened a “premium account” with defendant Kidder, Peabody & Company. (“Kidder, Peabody”). This account permitted plaintiff to deposit cash and securities with Kidder,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Creeger Brick & Building Supply Inc. v. Mid-State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Keystone Aeronautics Corporation, a Corporation v. R. J. Enstrom Corporation, a Corporation v. Foundry Allied Industries, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Marilyn M. WymanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Davis v. Pennsylvania Co., Etc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bucci v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. B.J.M., Jr., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Environmental Equipment & Service Co. v. Wachovia BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. And Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Edward D. Jones & Co. v. MishlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.