Legal Opinion

Creeger Brick & Building Supply Inc. v. Mid-State Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1989No. 187PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue in this appeal is whether a borrower has stated a legally cognizable cause of action against a lending institution which, although it has not violated the terms of its loan agreement, has allegedly failed to deal with its borrower in good faith. The trial court held that the averments of the complaint were insufficient to state a cause of action and sustained preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer. We agree and affirm.

A preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer admits every well-pleaded fact and all inferences reasonably deducible therefrom. McGaha…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. K.M.C. Co., Inc. v. Irving Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. RazumicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Germantown Manufacturing Co. v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. Etoll, Inc. v. Elias/Savion Advertising, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Corestates Bank, N.A. v. CutilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Badgett v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Parkway Garage Inc. v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Field v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API