Legal Opinion

Davis v. Pennsylvania Co., Etc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 1940No. Appeal, 66PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

This is an attempt by the beneficiaries of a trust to impose upon a bank, which was the depository of the trust funds, liability for embezzlements committed by the trustee. The court below — in our view properly— was of the opinion that the circumstances did not make defendant responsible, and accordingly entered judgment n. o. v. in its favor.

Caroline B. Davis, who died in 1903, by her will bequeathed her residuary estate, consisting of stocks and bonds, to her sons Thomas C. Davis and Nathan H. Davis, in trust to pay from the income the sum of $1,000 per annum…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Corporation for the Relief of Poor Distressed Presbyterian v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1831
  2. Lancaster v. DolanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
  3. Gordon v. PrestonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
  4. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Girard Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Pennsylvania Co. for Ins. v. Ninth Bk. T. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Trenton Trust Co. v. Western Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Burtt WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Edwards v. Northwestern BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. In Re Estate of WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Highland v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API