Legal Opinion

Sawyer v. Lund

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 16, 1942No. 45969PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSager, J.

The case, so far as it needs be stated, involves only the questions of contributory negligence and assumption of risk. There is no substantial dispute in the evidence. We think that the trial court should have sustained appellant’s motion to direct. Out of his own mouth appellee proved that he assumed the risk of the position he voluntarily took in the sales ring.

Appellant maintains a sales pavilion in Mason City in which horses are sold. The actual selling is done in what is called the “sales ring.” This is approximately 13 feet by 34 feet in dimension. Horses to be sold are led at a brisk…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mescher v. BroganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  2. Murphy v. Iowa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Blessing v. WeldingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Pazen v. Des Moines Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  5. Boles v. Hotel Maytag Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vandercar v. DavidDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API