Legal Opinion

Helvering v. Stuart

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 7, 1942No. Nos. 49 and 48PublishedCited by 523 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed

These petitions for certiorari bring here the liability of each respondent for increased income taxes for the years 1934 and 1935. A deficiency was determined by the Commissioner for each year because of the taxpayers' failure to include in their return income from various trusts previously created by them for the benefit of their children.

The taxpayers are brothers, residents of Illinois. In 1930 John Stuart, the respondent in No. 48, created one trust for each of his three children: Joan, Ellen and John. Later, in 1932, R. Douglas Stuart, the respondent in No. 49, created such trusts for…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by523 opinions

  1. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Petty v. Tennessee-Missouri Bridge CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Propper v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

518 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API