Legal Opinion

Ringer v. Graham

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 31, 1985No. 0486PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

This case involves a construction contract between appellants Richard C. Ringer and Anne S. Ringer and the respondent, David Graham. The disputed issues before the trial court were the amount of the contract, the right of Graham and the other respondents to mechanic’s liens, and the amounts of their liens. The trial judge granted the respondents’ motions for directed verdicts, finding that the amount of the contract was $97,000 and that all respondents were entitled to recover on their claims. The Ringers appeal. We reverse.

The Ringers essentially allege in their complaint that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hanselmann v. McCardleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. Chaney v. BurgessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  3. Melton v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. Planters Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  5. Arnold v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Santee Portland Cement Co. v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. Gauld v. O'SHAUGNESSY REALTY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Henderson v. St. Francis Community HospitalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  4. Stoudenmire Heating & Air Conditioning Co. v. Craig Building PartnershipCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Thomas v. DootsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API