Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Dootson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 13, 2008No. 4358PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKittredge, J.

This is an appeal from a directed verdict for Dr. Jeffrey Dootson in a medical malpractice case. The disposition of this appeal turns on whether there is evidence that Dr. Dootson had notice that a surgical drill overheated prior to the injury to the patient, Kelvin Thomas. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to Thomas, as we must, we find evidence Dr. Dootson had notice that the surgical drill was defective prior to the injury. As a result, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

I

During oral surgery, Thomas’ mouth was severely burned by a malfunctioning drill. Thomas filed a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Welch v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Player v. ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  3. Green v. LilliewoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. Pederson v. GouldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Bultman v. BarberSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brouwer v. Sisters of Charity Providence HospitalsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  2. Melton v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Melton v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Bank of North Carolina v. BouscarenDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
  5. Brouwer v. Sisters of Charity Providence HospitalsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API