Legal Opinion
Odian v. Habernicht
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 23, 1955No. Civ. 4931PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an action for damages arising from an automobile collision. The defendant’s answer denied negligence on his part and alleged contributory negligence. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant and the plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment.
The collision occurred at 3 p. m. on November 28, 1952, at the intersection of Jensen and Clovis Avenues at the outskirts of Fresno, this being a clear day. Jensen Avenue runs east and west, and Clovis Avenue north and south. The paved portion of Jensen was 30 feet wide and the paved portion of Clovis 24 feet wide. Jensen Avenue is a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Wells v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Brooks v. E. J. Willig Truck Transportation Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Conner v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Packard v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arenstein v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Parker v. WallaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Willie A. Davis v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, Charles S. Swanegan, Daisy Swanegan, and Lloyd W. Swanegan, as AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Hickenbottom v. JeppesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Stafford v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960