Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Demas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 6, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), dated» December 13, 1999, as granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Michael Murphy did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Orderéd that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

In support of her motion for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. HoegAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Mendola v. DemetresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Boehm v. Estate of MackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Thomas v. JoynerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Urbanski v. MulieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Kosciolek v. Jianguo ChenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Kraska v. PuleoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API