Legal Opinion
Mendola v. Demetres
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 6, 1995PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Beverly Rathgeber and Adam G. Rothman appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated June 25, 1993, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the appellants’ contention, the Supreme Court properly denied their motion for summary judgment, holding that they failed to establish that the plaintiff Angel…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Tipping-Cestari v. KilhennyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Conde v. Eric Service Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by35 opinions
- Coscia v. 938 Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Parker v. Defontaine-StrattonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Thomas v. HulslanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Feratovic v. Lun Wah, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Huggins v. DanielsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.