Legal Opinion

Flanagan v. Hoeg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 27, 1995PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated September 22, 1993, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) an order of the same court, dated November 23, 1993, as, upon renewal, adhered to the original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated September 22, 1993, is dismissed since that order was superseded by the order dated November 23, 1993, made upon renewal; and it is further,

Orde…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Conde v. Eric Service Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Sainte-Aime v. HoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Kearse v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Chaplin v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Waaland v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Dimenshteyn v. CarusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API