Legal Opinion

Kraska v. Puleo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dollard, J.), dated August 17, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the injured plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

*398The defendant failed to establish a prima facie case that the injured plaintiff did not sustain a serious…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. HoegAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Papadonikolakis v. First Fidelity Leasing Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Trantel v. RothenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Urbanski v. MulieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Murphy v. DemasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API