Legal Opinion

Palace Garage v. Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 8, 1928No. 17330PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

This is an appeal from the ' district court of Oklahoma county. The parties appear here as in the court below, and will be so referred to herein. Plaintiffs brought this action against the city of Oklahoma City to' enjoin the enfox-cement of a certain ordinance numbered 2982, and to have same declared unconstitutioxxal and void as being oppressive and unwarranted and the enforcement thereof destructive of the property and business of plaintiffs without due process of law, and therefox-e violative of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Defendant city filed a general…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hibbard, Spencer, Bartlett & Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Lacy v. City of OskaloosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Mayor of Frostburg v. WinelandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  4. Wright v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. City of Norfolk v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Virginia · 1892

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Big Four Foundry Co. v. HagensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. Hover v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. McCraney v. City of LeedsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. City of Norman v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Herrington v. City of PryorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API