Legal Opinion
Hover v. Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 16, 1928No. 18652PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, C.
The plaintiff in error, F. M. Hover, in behalf of himself and others not named, but alleged to be similarly situated, filed his petition in the district court of Oklahoma county, in which he sought to enjoin the city of Oklahoma City, together with its officers, from enforcing an ordinance of said city establishing, as plaintiff alleged, certain hours for him and his coplaintiffs to sell their products on a certain part of California street in said city.
A temporary injunction was granted, but when the cause came on for trial on the petition and answer, th'e temporary injunction was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Tinsley v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Walston v. NevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Head v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Quinn v. BaageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ex Parte DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Croxton v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Ex Parte StrauchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
- City of Fort Worth v. Southwest MagazineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Shinn v. Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.