Legal Opinion

Peters v. Lindley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 12, 1922No. 10955PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This was an action commenced by the defendant in error in the superior court of Okmulgee county against plaintiff in error on a promissory note executed by plaintiff in error to defendant in error. As a matter of convenience, the parties will hereinafter be referred to as they were designated in the trial court.

The defendant filed a motion alleging that the note upon which suit was brought was secured by a mortgage on certain real estate, which mortgage was executed by defendant as mortgagor to the plaintiff as mortgagee; that the defndant had sold the mortgaged property to one-H. C.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winans v. HareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Horne v. Oklahoma State Bank of AtokaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Scott v. NorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Hazle v. BondyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Merriam v. MilesNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. New York Casualty Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Beardsley v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Savings Bank of Ansonia v. SchancuppSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Blumenthal v. SerotaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
  5. Rice v. Federal Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API