Legal Opinion

Scott v. Norris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 23, 1917No. 8052PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from District Court, Kiowa County; T. A. Edwards, Judge. Action by Alfred Norris against D. A. Scott, E. A. Wesson, and Julia Wesson upon certain promissory notes and to foreclose a mortgage, with cross-petition by defendants Wesson. Judgment for plaintiff and for cross-petitioners, and defendant Scott appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BURFOR1), C.

Norris brought suit upon certain promissory notes and a mortgage securing the same executed by th-wessons. He sought to recover against Scott upon an alleged assumption by Scott of the debt evidenced by the notes and mortgage. By way of cross-petition the Wessons alleged that they had sold an undivided one-half interest in the mortgaged land to Scott, and that the consideration therefor was that Scott should pay the mortgage of the plaintiff, together with two other mortgages on the land. A written contract assuming certain mortgages was pleaded. It was further alleged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Locke v. HomerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Homeland Realty Co. v. RobisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Winans v. HareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Hatcher v. KinkaidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Greer v. OrchardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sooner Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oklahoma Central Credit UnionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Beardsley v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Eastin v. Roberts, Carpenter & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Linbrook Realty Corp. v. RogersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  5. Page v. HincheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API