Legal Opinion

Beardsley v. Stephens

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 30, 1928No. 18119PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, C.

This is an action in which E. I-I. Ryan brings a foreclosure suit on a mortgage covering 80 acres of land orig inally executed by Harry I). Joll. Joll transferred the land by deed to C. W. Stephens, who bought the land subject to the mortgage without assuming or agreeing to pay the same. O. W. Stephens sold the land to Dan Beardsley subject to the mortgage, but with a clause in the deed that the grantee, Dan Beardsley “assumes payment of and agrees to satisfy” the mortgage with interest at maturity.

In the original petition, which was filed in said cause, Ryan only asked for a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vrooman v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Fry v. AusmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. McDonald v. FinsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Winans v. HareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Van Eman v. MosingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. MattesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Gibbs v. Trinity Universal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Page v. HincheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Continental Life Ins. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API