Prudential Insurance v. Fromberg
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Plaintiff sought and secured a declaratory judgment that upon termination of defendant’s employment as plaintiff’s agent it was entitled to retain certain sums advanced to defendant under two salary plans referred to in the pleadings as Incentive Salary Plan and Potential Commission Advance Plan respectively. The present appeal is from such judgment, the principal contention being that recovery may not be had under either of the above plans since they violate section 221 of the Labor Code making it “unlawful for any employer to collect or receive from an employee any part of wages theretofore…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Crestview Cemetery Ass'n v. DiedenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Kerr's Catering Service v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Fomco, Inc. v. Joe Maggio, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Apra v. AureguyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hudgins v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Prachasaisoradej v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Koehl v. Verio, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- DeLeon v. Verizon Wireless, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Phillips v. Gemini Moving SpecialistsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.