Legal Opinion
Bancroft Steel Co. v. Kuniholm Mfg. Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided July 8, 1938PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.
The plaintiff, a corporation engaged in the selling of steel, on December 6, 1934, entered into a written agreement of conditional sale with the Industrial Hardware Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the industrial company, which manufactured a product called “baby-walkers, ” whose basic material was steel. Among other things the agreement provided that “title to all merchandise delivered” to the industrial company,' “whether in the original, manufactured or completed state, shall at all times remain in” the plaintiff “until payment therefor in cash is made” to *93the plaintiff, that the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Silver v. GravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Noble v. Joseph Burnett Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Ramey Lumber Co. v. John Schroeder Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
- Bousquet v. Mack Motor Truck Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Hyland v. HylandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re MarkertDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
- Rosen v. Haines-Ce Brook, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
- Carr v. Associates Discount Corp.United States District Court · 1941
- Carr v. Associates Discount Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1941
- Hall Buick & Pontiac, Inc. v. Bromley Auto Sales, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.