Legal Opinion

In Re Markert

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 15, 1942No. 65940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

In these proceedings the referee has ordered a creditor to re-assign, and pay to the Trustee in Bankruptcy the proceeds of, transfers of property which the referee deemed to be voidable preferences, as defined in the amended Bankruptcy Act of June 22, 1938, known as the “Chandler Act”. 11 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. The creditor has duly petitioned for a review of the order.

The transfers in question were a mortgage of, personal property, including after-acquired merchandise, and assignments of accounts receivable then due and thereafter to become due the bankrupt.

The facts…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thompson v. FairbanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Humphrey v. TatmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Finance & Guaranty Co. v. OppenhimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Wasserman v. McDonnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re GreenbergDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
  2. Francis J. Curtis, Trustee in Bankruptcy for the Tam Corporation v. Vernon J. Knox and Helen Diekman, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  3. Francis J. Curtis, Trustee in Bankruptcy for the Tam Corporation v. Vernon J. Knox and Helen Diekman, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  4. In re Super Value MarketDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API